Tuesday, 3 April 2012

THIS GIRL'S PERSPECTIVE ON VALENTINE'S DAY

I'm not going to lie, friends. It was a little bit sad (is a little bit sad) getting through Valentine's Day without a romantic love in my life. And I don't think I'm special or extra-deserving or anything. I know lots of people don't have romantic love in their lives on this day and I saw a lot of thoughts about the day -- good, bad, and indifferent -- scroll across Facebook. These are my thoughts and reflections, in general, on this particular Valentine's Day.

I, myself, went to bed last night feeling rather unhappy with the scene. But maybe I was just over-tired. When I woke, though, I felt differently. Maybe it's the clarity those early waking minutes bring. In that first hour I was up, before office telephones started ringing and legal documents had to be reviewed and created, a distinct feeling washed over me. And that feeling was one of gratitude for having always felt love from my friends even when romantic love was not in my life. I recognize that many people spend their lives steeped in greater loneliness than I.

So I decided to honor the day and the idea of love and companionship. I put on a pink plaid shirt. I bought a heart-shaped breakfast biscuit. I turned on my "Love" playlists on iTunes. The point: to keep my heart open to the idea of someone with whom I can share that part of my soul, maybe to even manifest such a blessing. To be clear, I am one of those who believe that if you look for love, you're much less likely to find it than if you let fate kind of take the wheel. So I don't look...but, yeah, I dream.

And it made me happy for my friends when I saw their thrilled posts scroll across Facebook, posting pictures of flowers and cards or checking in at restaurants for lunch or dinner with their significant others. I wondered about the slight anxiety or discomfort -- or excitement! -- of those friends in relationships too new to post something with confidence. I wondered if anyone out there still got anonymous love notes or gifts (the last of which I received, I think, in maybe my sophomore year in high school) or if the relative anonymity of the Internet eliminated the need for such pre-planned, tangible offerings.

In the end, I think what gets people is not the fact that they're "alone" (in that certain context) on Valentine's Day. I think it's that being "alone" sort of feels...well...underlined on that day. But tomorrow that underline will be erased and those of us without partners can all get back to the business of being happy, single adults...with our hearts open to the modification of the "single" part.

Scrabble: I Just Can't Quit!!

Or so two out of three directors tell me. That's right, I am talking about resigning or "forfeiting" if you prefer. I can not think of any other competitive two person game that does not allow a person to stop playing when they believe they are going to lose. The majority of chess games end in resignation, tournament magic is the same (here is a link to more info on this gamehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_the_Gathering ) poker players always have the opportunity to fold. Even tennis and golf players have the ability to "withdraw" when a match or round is going badly. Only scrabble insists on the sadistic (literally, the enjoyment of another's forced suffering) practice of continuing the game regardless of the chance of a comeback or the mental state of the participants. Or does it? The official tournament rules ( http://scrabble-assoc.com/rules/otrf-main.html ) have this to say about forfeits: If you must leave a game in progress, and you and your opponent cannot finish at a later time agreeable to both of you and the Director, you receive a forfeit loss for that game. If you are ahead in score when you leave, 50 points are subtracted from your total spread. If you are behind, 50 points plus the amount you are behind are subtracted from your total spread.
Byes and forfeits are not used in computing new ratings.
A game that begins with both players present and is then forfeited is rated as a completed game.





So what is going on here? Well, imprecise phrasing causes a contradiction near the end (they are trying to say that games are rated if two players show up and do not if only one player is there).


More interesting though, is the simple word "must" at the beginning. This is a very subjective term and I have heard a different interpretation from each director I have asked about it. These are all people who have taken the time to study and pass a test devised by the N.S.A. and either run sanctioned clubs and/or multiple rated tournaments. You would think it would be an issue that is unequivocably resolved by the governing body that runs a game, or at least that an accord would be reached by those who mange the nuts and bolts of running tournaments. Instead, some directors rely on hearsay "well I heard that they did this at a tournament in ____ so let's do that" or suddenly become doctors "well it says 'must', do you have a fever?" or worst of all, have no knowledge of the rules whatsover: "the rules say you can not forfeit". This is where things get particularly sticky. Going to a scrabble club or even a scrabble tournament is not like going to a Denny's (aside from how many old people are there) where you can expect a similiar experience regardless of where in the U.S. you happen to be. Instead it is more like pulling off the highway and going to a locally owned restaurant that is the only place food is available on the exit. There will be some similarities such as food, seats, and the exchange of money, but service and the overall experience will vary greatly. In other words, tournaments and clubs (like small restaurants) are owned by their organizers and directors and can be run however they want. I mention this not to disparage any particular individuals, but rather whatever (mis)governing body in the N.S.A. allowed matters to reach this state. The CGP "discussion" forum recently had a long running argument over whether directors should be allowed to play in their own tournaments. Whatever you feel on this issue, the larger concern is that there is no official policy. Where do frustration and lack of oversight lead?.... Hazing! Seriously though, I am getting really tired of hearing justifications of why it's taboo in scrabble to resign that are basically: "It felt horrible the other day when I had to suffer through a blowout loss and it was just your 'turn' to go through that experience". I am sorry that anyone has to go through it. There is something fundamentally wrong with any game that features prominently the trapping and mental torture of its players, whether it is "equally divided" or not. But what about spread? Well join me next time when we take a look at the root of a lot (maybe most) of organized scrabble's problems: the silly specter of spread.

World's Best Scrabble Player

Who is the best Scrabble Player in the world?

That is a difficult question because there are many different countries with different rating systems.
Many have argued that Nigel Richards, or Parkorn Nemitrmansuk are the best, or the 2003 world champion Panupol Sujjayakorn. Some may even say Joel Wapnick is the best because he has won the world championship once and finished second twice, along with his other top 50 placings.

A more logical of working out the best player is to look at international tournaments such as Bob Jackman has done.International Ratings This does not take player’s individual ratings into account however and is limited by the number of tournaments classed as international.

Another problem with this method is that some tournaments have only two countries playing, such as the Trans Tasman and there are also problems with lack of information. I believe if a player has played less than 100 games then their rating is not very accurate due to the small number of games. I have also noticed that for some reason a few players that have competed in World Championships are not on this list, such as Brian Cappelletto for example.

Another method of rating players could to look at past World Championship results. WSC Players by past performance

The problem with this is that it takes old data into account and a tournament played in the 80s would be quite different to a tournament played now.

We need a method that takes a large amount of data into account and looks at a wide array of tournament results. There should be some method of comparing various results from USA and Australia for example, even though they use different rating systems.

It was suggested recently that some sort of calibration of various national systems could be possible by fitting a distribution to each rating system and shifting them according to a mean. This may not be highly accurate but would be useful in comparing various countries and opponents especially for the World Scrabble Championships.


After some consideration and some random thoughts I have come up with my top 20 world scrabble players. I based it on the various lists discussed and my personal opinions.

Of course some of these players I haven’t heard that much about or seen play, like David Gibson but he is the number one player in the US apparently.

My Top 20 Overall
1. Adam Logan (CAN/UK)
2. Panupol Sujjayakorn (Thailand) – [Zedoary online]
3. Ganesh Asirvatham (Malaysia) – [Juggernaut online]
4. Pakorn Nemitrmansuk (Thailand) – [Pakorn online]
5. Narween Fernando (AUS) – [Nawster online]
6. Nigel Richards (Malaysia)
7. Brian Cappelleto (US) – [Bricap online]
8. Andrew Fisher (AUS) – [Aphis online]
9. Edward Okulicz (AUS) – [Taqi online]
10. David Eldar (AUS) – [deldar182]
11. Mark Nyman (UK)
12. Helen Gipson (UK) – [Pooh online]
13. Andrew Davis (UK) – [Bin70 online]
14. David Boys (CAN)
15. Dave Wiegand (USA) - [Drbing online]
16. Komol Panyasoponlert (Thailand)
17. Charnwit Sukhumrattanaporn (Thailand)
18. Jakkrit Klaphajone (Thailand)
19. Joel Wapnick (Canada)
20. Jude Obinna (Nigeria) – [Judeobinna online]
21. David Gibson (US)





Another interesting list of Scrabble world players is the highest earners, Highest Earners
maintained by Jim Geary. Some of the best players haven’t made it onto this list yet but it interesting to see.

Some Top Earners from Jimgeary.com

1. 129300 David Gibson
2. 110545 Brian Cappelletto
3. 087170 Joe Edley
4. 076286 Joel Sherman
5. 060520 Joel Wapnick
6. 059005 Nigel Richards
7. 040175 Ron Tiekert
8. 037943 Mark Nyman
9. 037659 Adam Logan
10. 037070 Trey Wright
11. 027744 Naween Fernando
12. 024848 Pakorn Nemitrmansuk
13. 024816 Jakkrit Klaphajone
14. 024020 David Wiegand
15. 023125 Peter Morris
16. 021673 Robert Felt
17. 019579 David Boys
18. 018471 Panupol Sujjayakorn
19. 017745 Andrew Fisher

WORDS OF THE WEEK

OXYGENIC
ISOGENIC
ZOOGENIC


BOOR
BOORD
BOORDE

BOORTREE

BORD
BORDE
BORDEL
BORDELLO

UINTAITE

DICH
DICHT
DICHTED

DICHORD

CAJAPUT
CAJEPUT
CAJUPUT

USUCAPT

COOL HOOK OF THE WEEK:

JIN + RICKSHAW = JINRICKSHAW

Also: JIN + RICKSHA = JINRICKSHA

Monday, 2 April 2012

QUOTE

"WINNING AND LOSING IS A PART OF GAME"

"Q" WITHOUT "U"

2-letter Word
QI

3-letter Words
QAT QIS SUQ
4-letter Words
QADI QAID QATS QOPH SUQS WAQF

5-letter Words
BURQA FAQIR QADIS QAIDS QIBLA QOPHS TALAQ TRANQ UMIAQ WAQFS

6-letter Words
BURQAS BUQSHA FAQIRS QANATS QASIDA QIBLAS QIGONG QINDAR QINTAR  QIVIUT QWERTY SHEQEL TALAQS TRANQS UMIAQS YAQONA
7-letter Words
BUQSHAS INQILAB QABALAH QASIDAS QIGONGS QINDARS QINTARS QIVIUTS   QWERTYS TSADDIQ TZADDIQ YAQONAS

8-Letter Words
INQILABS     MBAQANGA MUQADDAM QABALAHS QAINAQAM QALAMDAN QINDARKA  QWERTIES SHEQALIM TSADDIQS TZADDIQS

9-letter Words
MBAQANGAS   MUQADDAMS   QAINAQAMS   QALAMDANS   QINGHAOSU TSADDIQIM TZADDIQIM

PAKISTAN SCRABBLE ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP

JOIN PAKISTAN SCRABBLE ASSOCIATION
Become a PSA member by downloading and filling out the
form below and send it along with  pay-order in favour of
Pakistan Scrabble Association on our mailing address.
Annual membership fee: Rs.1,600/-
Life membership fee: Rs.4,000/-
Annual service charges: Rs. 600/-